Posts belonging to Category 'Ford Cars'

One Fine Day OT

Question:

It has been a horrendous ten days or more of death watches. I feel I want to eliminate CNN from my roster if TV cannels. With Terry Schiavo, The Pope, Prince Ranier not to forget Rosie’s loss of her Mom, it gets one to thinking about quality of life. l Last night I heard eminent environmentalist David Suzuki address an enormous audience at a health show in Toronto. He pointed out that what we are doing to our earth and ourselves (which are pretty inseparable) is heading us on a doomsday course and I certainly believe him. David has set up a worldwide Nature Challenge and gotten support from every strata of society including Canadian Mayors and Provincial Premiers. Suzuki listed ten things we can do to help ourselves and our world and asked each of us to commit to just three and said in could make a diddrence. (I selected five)   What we are trying to do here on ASD about obesity certainly qualifies as an important measure to benefit our society too.  http://www.davidsuzuki.org/ Reduce home energy use by 10% X Choose an energy-efficient home & appliances Don’t use

car hire in Brisbane

Question:

Anyone recommend cheap car hire for 3 weeks in the Brisbane area?

Response:

We used www.shoestrings.com.au Not bad value and a good car (Toyota Avalon) Dean.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Anyone recommend cheap car hire for 3 weeks in the Brisbane area?

Response:

Anyone recommend cheap car hire for 3 weeks in the Brisbane area?

Cheap without hidden extras or hassle. www.justexploreaustralia.com Cars aren’t new, but we’ve been quite happy with the ones we’ve rented (3 times – Ford Falcon, Fairlane, Fairmont) and would use Debbie and Bruce anytime.. Anette

Response:

Please! Not social workers, caseworkers

Question:

On 12 Sep 2004 16:56:01 GMT, fern5…@aol.com (Fern5827) wrote: ….The Plant demands, in this post I reply to, that I not cross post Its posts to other groups…..whadda yah think folks, shall I not crosspost on threat of ….something bad happening to me…eheheheh…? …………………………….nah……R R R R R e e e e >Subject: Re: |Re: Please!  Not social workers, caseworkers >From: fern5…@aol.com  (Fern5827) >Date: 9/12/2004 10:49 AM Eastern Daylight Time >Message-id: <20040912104952.25417.00000…@mb-m22.aol.com> >TOP Post: >Why aren’t these drones working.

Translation: "Awk! Awk!" >Cane bleats: >> I’ve probably been in 25 or 30 offices of >>CPS so many times I’ve lost count and universally they sit, when they >>have time from their "driving around in state cars drumming up >>business" (R R R R …OH SHIT…THAT A GOOD ONE) in cubicles lined >>with pictures of their kids. Many >DRONES.  Ineffective, ineffectual, failed audits.  No good outcomes.

Translation: "Awk! Awk!" >>show me how much their child had grown or developed since the last >>time I was there, three weeks before. It was cute and funny. >Got lots of time to stroll thru CPS offices.

Translation: "Awk! Awk!" Sure I do. I’m "comfortable" as they used to say. >Is that why every state failed?  You drone on like a boar.  Spelling >intentional.

Translation: "Awk! Awk!" My "strolling" makes the states fail? I’ve never heard boars drone. I’ve shot a few. Knifed two, baynetted would be more accurate. Koolau Range on the Island of Oahu, and in the mountains of Molokai. One nearly got me but the dogs turned him. Ah, youth. What I wouldn’t give……. >Unfortunately, I would like to see CPS become more effective.

Oh, then you are against the droouggyy plan? Please explain? It’s nice to see that you understand the conflicting roles of CPS and the police, and how the latter taking over that of the former in the investigation area could result in more criminal convictions and disruptions of families…kids don’t care if they parents are crooks as long as they can have them….sadly the two don’t go together. >And lawsuits are one way.

Really. Take money from a strapped agency, even sometimes by fraudulent claims…which CPS, like all government agencies have to settle out of court if the AG vets the case as too costly..(not unwinnable) just too costly to pursue? It’s common. I won’t tell you the dollar amounts I know that are the bottom line trigger number, as greegor would wet himself with anticipation, but it’s pretty damn high. More than I got for my last timber sale and that was the Japan at the highest the market has ever been…made me a ….well, nevermind. >It’s happening now.  CPS has outlived its mandate, and needs to operate >preventatively, not punitively.

I see. Investigation possible abuse and neglect isn’t a preventative? So tell us. What would be a preventative operation? And if Head Start, by the way, worked to reduce child abuse and neglect how is it we saw not such change in data from its inception to the present? >BTW, do not forward my posts to NG which I have not posted to.

Oh, what are you going to do, drip Sap on me? I’ll forward them anywhere I please, including directly to those you malign slanderously. >But your coarse,

Actually I’m mistaken for a Methodist preacher from time to time. >bluff-like behavior

Don’t assume anyone is bluffing unless you have the means to counter if they are not. > shows the utter RACKETEERING, RICO >behavior manifest by lobbyists

Are you accusing me of being a racketeer? >who need to continue the failed status quo with >CPS nationwide.

Translation: "Awk! Awk!" Well, I do need to continue the good work CPS has done, as evidenced even things you twits have posted, pointing to federal databases and such. Yet I’m always in favor of improvement. One family helped and winning, as Dan does it, is more powerful a reform act than the years of blathering lying misleading reformer insulting and disrupting garbage you post. You could be, from my perspective, a practitioner of CPS confusion, sent here to pretend to be a reformer to discredit reformers. On the other hand, I am reasonable sure CPS doesn’t operate that way. I am a far more effective reformer than you, a supporter and advocate for relatives…as I DO things, I don’t sit and whine about how bad things are…when they are not. By the way, what’s a "failed status quo?" Your command of english is matched by your command of simple logic. Kane, the boar, eh? My astrological sign in the asian calendar by the way, Thank you, stupid, for yet another chance to educate you and others. Propagandists don’t stand a chance against those such as I…all we have to do is keep telling the truth long enough….it’s a rule that works both ways…and my persistence is something amazing. Asian Zodiac: Boar     Years: 1923, 1935, 1947, 1959, 1971, 1983, 1995, 2007 Character: Pure of heart, Boar people are generous and kind. Full of inner strength and courage, they can take on any task. A friend who listens, the Boar is sincere and trustworthy. They are driven by their passion for life. Compatible with: Tiger, Rabbit, Rat and Ram Non-Compatible with: Snake Western Counterpart: Scorpio Famous Boars: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Chiang Kai-Shek, Woody Allen, Lucille Ball, Billy Crystal, Steven Spielberg, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Stephen King, Henry Ford, John McEnroe,  Tracey Ullman,  Phil Donahue, Fred Astaire,   Thomas Jefferson, Dudley Moore, Farrah Fawcett, Robert Dole, Jerry Lee Lewis,   Humphrey Bogart, Julie Andrews, Richard Dreyfuss,  Henry Kissinger, Marie Osmond, Ralph Waldo Emerson and the Dalai Lama. I once had a dream I later related to a Chinese friend, who claimed it propitious, that I would have my hearts desires…and damn, it came together over the next three years exactly that way…and I’m not superstitious at all. I dreampt I was hunting the lower very dry country of leeward Molokai, a place I hunted when I worked for the Cook family. 20,000 acres or more of Kiawa (algoroba..mesquite) and lantana (honest, it grows wild there, waist high and hides axis deer and wild pig all too well). I came to a canyon, about 20 yards across, and a small pack of pigs showed on the farside feeding on Kiawe pods. I shot the large boar leading them. Then with my companions I crossed the ravine, a rugged climb, very hot and dry and itchy from the lantana. I split the pig open and field dressed, gutted, him, and put him up on my back around my neck..probably near a hundred pounds.  After a short walk he came to life (of course I never had one do that in real life) and I set him down and he snorted and began hunting for food along the ground and wandered away. No heart, lungs, nothing. Just life force. I let him go. You ever dream about a wild boar? Maybe tonight. I’m as lucky for others as I am for myself. My current wife, (my previous wife passed) came along about two months after I had that dream, Her life was changed by me, rather dramatically for the better. I think she still thinks so, <smile>. I do hope you’ll dream of a boar tonight, and it must be propitious of you to suddenly pop up with that metaphore. Maybe something good is about to happen for you…like you will awaken your honesty and you’ll stop this dangerous treatment of families that come here. And slough off the crackpot notions of phony reform. Kane

Response:

On 12 Sep 2004 14:49:52 GMT, fern5…@aol.com (Fern5827) wrote: >TOP Post: >Why aren’t these drones working.

The ones in the cubicles? Where do you wish them to work? They have reports to make, calls to return, calls to make, case preparation to appear in court to do, children to visit, CRB panels to testify to, and of course their "drive around in state cars looking for families to terrorize." 0;-> Do you think they’d do better work if the conditions, like not being allowed to put up pics of family and friends, and pets, and children, and possibly being flogged every four hours just to touch them up and keep them from driving so much would help? >Cane bleats: >> I’ve probably been in 25 or 30 offices of >>CPS so many times I’ve lost count and universally they sit, when they >>have time from their "driving around in state cars drumming up >>business" (R R R R …OH SHIT…THAT A GOOD ONE) in cubicles lined >>with pictures of their kids. Many >DRONES.

Uh, they tend to get lost in the employeement probationary period, usually six months in most states. It’s easy to spot those that don’t work, in the middle of a high tension high productive site like a working CPS office. It’s one of the noisiest office setting worksites I’ve ever visited. Nike was a bit noisier, but that was because they were geared to fun…CPS isn’t. > Ineffective,

Not according the the data at DHHS/ACF. In fact they have done some extraordinary work in the face of all the obsticles. Lack of funding. Low wages for the responsibilities they have. >ineffectual,

When they immediately stop an abuse, or dangerous neglect situation I tend to cut them some slack on being "ineffectual" at satisfying your demands. Hell, I might even forgive them if they DID just go for a ride in a state care for a bit to get out of the madness of what they see and hear hour after hour in their work. It’s never-ending…when it isn’t their own cases it’s that of their neighbor they can hear the business of over the cubicle wall. You’d cave with about 20 minutes of that, or be kicked out in the sixth month of your probation as being ineffective, and unproductive. You are you know, even at this. >failed audits.

Yes some. Not all areas, and not all states in all areas. As I’ve posted proof of. For true reform one does not simply kneecap the players. True reformers list the areas needing work (this is going on even now by others, and CPS is going to earn funding by meeting the new goals..and do it NOT by meeting ALL shortfalls…just the ones most needed). You’d also, to encourage, as it does all humans, point out, as the audits DO, the areas of success. None of you do that. That is how I know you are not genuine reformers at all. > No good outcomes.

Not according to even the feds that did the evaluations. They recognized the successes, and even the "leaners" as they say in horseshoes…and leaners get wins… Children were served and families were still served in those areas you call "failures." Many of them. Blood lust is such an ugle thing for a women, don’t you think, Fern? I’ve likened, in my mind, this forum, to a day at the Roman Collesium, with blood on the sand, and lust maddened spectators giving thumbs down again and again, until the disgusting point where I don’t read it anymore. >>show me how much their child had grown or developed since the last >>time I was there, three weeks before. It was cute and funny. >Got lots of time to stroll thru CPS offices.

No, and yes. What difference would it make to refuting your claims, one way or the other? Or are we going steady now? >Is that why every state failed?

No, because every state did not fail on all counts. 16 did. >You drone on like a boar.  Spelling >intentional.

I know. Your insults are as effective as your untruths and misleading disconnected propaganda. >Unfortunately, I would like to see CPS become more effective.

And spoil your fun? Read that line out loud. You are saying, in effect, that it’s unfortunate that you would like to see CPS become more effective. Do you get the irony of your syntax clumsiness? It would make you deeply saddened if that claim actually did come true, because it would either reduce your exercising your bloodlust, or you’d have to go hunting for prey elsewhere, a tough job at your age, changing. >And lawsuits are one way.

Yes. I keep waiting for you to come up with others, that do not exacerbate the problem of an already funding strapped agency. So far I see none. Got any? Unnngh, that do NOT cost more money? >It’s happening now.

The lawsuits? Sure. Always some around. Some justfied, and many not. CPS has a formula for dealing with them. I won’t tell you or other possible miscreants what it is, but it works to cut expenses to the taxpayer for that budget item (they actually forecast for it now, actuarially). So tell me, how high do you wish to be taxed? Bleeding Heart Liberal are you? > CPS has outlived its mandate,

Nope. Not until child abuse and neglect are gone. >and needs to operate >preventatively,

Other programs, many totally voluntary, are already mandated to the prevention goals. Even the local parks department has them. > not punitively.

Yes, I’d love it, and you’ll let me know when it starts, that people who use their own children for the sexual pleasure, who don’t even afford the children toothbrushes, soap, and hit them frequently, start coming to non-punitive based voluntary prevention programs. The idea that throwing money at Head Start is the answer I think is the same kind of magical thinking little children do so much of. >BTW, do not forward my posts to NG which I have not posted to.

I don’t. I reply and crosspost MY post to other groups. And I’ll continue to do as I please with my post, including attribute yours fully or partially as I see fit. You forward other’s posts, you cut and paste, you even place misleading subject lines over others written product. >But your coarse, bluff-like behavior

You can’t tell if I am bluffing or not. Someday, if I’m kindly disposed, I’ll tell you if I’ve followed through on some of the things I’ve told you I’ve done in regards to you, but I’ll have to have your genuine E-mail addy to do that. >shows the utter RACKETEERING,

Are you speaking of me? Kane, know by this name to probably thousands of people in my non-digital world…all over Hawaii, for instance, and in Taiwan? Thin ice, ducky. Thin ice. >RICO >behavior

And it’s getting warmer. Would you care to retract, or are you going to remain as blind to the facts of the world as you seem to be in other matters? > manifest by lobbyists

That I am and have been. Against CPS shortcomings. I simply don’t lie and scream for their blood. They seem to respond better, even when I catch them at serious mistakes or malfeasance. Funny about how effective I am, and how impotent you and others here are. I think it has to do with "doing," rather than "whining." We tend to know how to make things work. Practicing ’success’ tends to do that. > who need to continue the failed status quo with >CPS nationwide.

I have no such need, nor would I even if what you claim were true. I come and go and act or not in this world as I see fit. CPS hasn’t failed, and "status" is still "quo" because it’s the citizen’s "status" and "quo" not mine, or CPS’ exclusively. CPS is the servant of the people, citizens that work, and vote, and whose elected representatives have formed CPS. You have a good day, Fern. And yes, I am crossposting my reply to another ng. I might do two or three others..haven’t decided yet, as I compose. We’ll see. I’m sure I’ll do aps, as this is where you do so much off-topic posting and I thought, just for old time’s sake, I’d keep up the tradition for awhile. Until I’m done with you. Kane

Response:

"Kane" <pohakuyakok…@subdimension.com> wrote in message

news:7ed8d1be.0409121218.137802ac@posting.google.com… > On 12 Sep 2004 16:56:01 GMT, fern5…@aol.com (Fern5827) wrote: > ….The Plant demands, in this post I reply to, that I not cross post > Its posts to other groups…..whadda yah think folks, shall I not > crosspost on threat of ….something bad happening to > me…eheheheh…? > …………………………….nah……R R R R R e e e e

This is among the more humorous of it’s posts!  This lifeform is infamous for crossposting, even to the extent of posting unknowing other’s posts to disparate newsgroups without their knowledge. My dear departed Mommy used to have lots of axiom’s, one of my favorites being: "A fox always smells it’s own hole first".  If one has had the opportunity to ride to the hounds, this little ditty will be found to be ever so applicable towards this old critter. Sherman.

Response:

Gas Tank Leaks . . . Repair?

Question:

I have a 1977 Ford Pickup. The gas tank developed a small pinhole leak. I repaired it with some of that putty/epoxy they sell. It then developed another small leak. I probably need to do a more drastic type of repair. What’s available?

A new Gas Tank is needed.  You are wasting your time, putting your health and safety at risk, and possibly eating away your driveway coatings. Safety First, tom Thanks, Tom

           http://www.CarFleaMarket.com   Discover low-cost sell my car ads to the web!

Response:

I have a 1977 Ford Pickup. The gas tank developed a small pinhole leak. I repaired it with some of that putty/epoxy they sell. It then developed another small leak. I probably need to do a more drastic type of repair. What’s available? Thanks, Tom

You should bite the bullet and replace the tank.  You will be chasing these pinhole rust leaks forever. If you have any experience working on cars, the tank replacement is not hard, just be careful with the gasoline. You can find replacement gas tanks easily.  I’d look at the warranty offered more so than the price. If you aren’t comfortable replacing the tank yourself, any repair shop should be able to do it. good luck — Dave in Columbus

Response:

I have a 1977 Ford Pickup. The gas tank developed a small pinhole leak. I repaired it with some of that putty/epoxy they sell. It then developed another small leak. I probably need to do a more drastic type of repair. What’s available? Thanks, Tom

Here are new tanks for you’re truck. http://www.lmctruck.com/features/fc/FCGTK.htm

Response:

stickshift questions

Question:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach?

My (now departed) 1973 Dodge panel van with a "3-on-a-tree".

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach?

Econobox.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – : I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to : drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to : get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on : the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. : : This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without : street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to : stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. : What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach? Probably some GM P.O.S. The same company that would mate a foot-operated emergency brake with a manual transmission (on the other hand, Ford this on one of my POS cars). It must be an "American thing".

Most manual trans Volvo 240 series came with no tach, not a big deal, you only need a tach if you are deaf, or unaware of what a car is supposed to sound/feel like. Bernard

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach?

Unfortunately, most of them. A tachometer is seen as an extra-cost doodad, and a manual transmission as for the pathetically poor. It seems that lots of cars with automatics come with a tach, though.  At one time, I wanted to order a manual Escort with a tach; I would have had to order tilt wheel and cruise to get it, as I recall. <snip — -Stephen H. Westin Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street.

What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach? So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

I doubt it.  You’re going so slow, it’s not heating up the brakes at all.

Response:

I’ve drove manuals for years with and without tachs. I find that once I get accustomed to a car I never look at the tach. Just learn to drive by feel, and when it feels right shift. Hearing isn’t important, the vibrations tell you all you need to know. Often you hear, "Drive by the seat of your pants", well that pretty much sums it up. If using the handbrake makes it easier thats fine, once you get used to the clutch, you will find its unnecessary. To maximize clutch life. Don’t get in the habit of driving with your foot on the clutch. Completety remove your foot from the clutch after each shift. And don’t use the clutch to hold the vehicle from rolling backward on a hill at a signal light, thats what the brakes for. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

Response:

I wouldn’t say that it is bad for the brake unless this is happening alot, but the effect on the clutch might be a different matter.

I agree. The fact that you need to use the e-brake is indicitave of poor clutching.

Or indicative of early training in the use of the clutch. It is, admittedly, the easiest way to get going when you don’t have the various hand and foot coordination efforts down pat. Eventually, the OP will want to get to the point where he/she can sit on a hill, gradually release the clutch to the point that it is engaging and starting to slow down the engine a bit. Then, once ready to start out, release the brake pedal and gently apply throttle to help the slipping clutch keep the car from at least rolling back, and preferably moving forward. If the road you’re practicing on is too steep than try a lower grade until you feel more comfortable.

That’s how I taught my daughter, and am now teaching my son, to perform this admittedly tricky maneuver. Otherwise, as someone else mentioned, eventually you get used to it and will just be able to feel the engine.

Or know your vehicle well enough to not even feel or hear the engine. I can shift either of my vehicles without looking down at the tach (one doesn’t have one) even with the radio going and the A/C blowing full blast. Eventually, you just get a good feel for each vehicle and know about when to shift subconciously. Beware of anyone that attempts to get you to focus on shifting at a particular RPM or particular speed (if you don’t have a tach). I’ve watched more than one person spend more time concentrating on the instrument panel than the road in an attempt to not "burn out their engine" or, worse yet, to "save gas". Most modern engines have a cut-off to keep you from overrevving the engine. — Malcolm

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

I wouldn’t say that it is bad for the brake unless this is happening alot, but the effect on the clutch might be a different matter. The fact that you need to use the e-brake is indicitave of poor clutching. Taking too long to engage the clutch and start your forward movement could be causing excessive wear. You should shoot for one second max from beginning to engage to full engagement of the clutch even on a hill. This will prevent you from rolling back once you get the hang of it. It’s probably better to chirp your tires a little rather than burn the clutch. If the road you’re practicing on is too steep than try a lower grade until you feel more comfortable. Even after years of driving a stick, I still feel uneasy when I drive w/o a tach because I often tend to shift late and would suggest that you try to get one installed if you can. Otherwise, as someone else mentioned, eventually you get used to it and will just be able to feel the engine. After a while, it’s so natural that driving an automatic will be unnerving. Good luck

Response:

You don’t have to listen for it, you’ll feel it. Seriously if a car starts lugging there’s no doubt about what it’s doing. Experience is the best teacher in this case and he’s probably right on the 20 hour thing.

]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] I agree completely that you do not listen at all.. It is all feel…and smell if you have a tendency to slip the clutch way too much…lol Personally  ( from teaching my children anyway ) I do not think 20 hours is even close to the time it takes to learn… Sorry but the figure is much much less then that… My 3 children all took 2 minutes to get the feel..another couple of hours playing with the car to become very comfortable with using  a clutch … Now I must admit that the "lessons" were given on generally flat roads.. But neither had trouble holding the car on a incline after the initial "few" hours…using opnly the clutch and no brake… I NEVER allowed any of them to use the emergency brake…not needed Bob Griffiths

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

You don’t have to listen for it, you’ll feel it. Seriously if a car starts lugging there’s no doubt about what it’s doing. Experience is the best teacher in this case and he’s probably right on the 20 hour thing.

Response:

|I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to | drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to | get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on | the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. | | This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without | street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to | stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. | | So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake | only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad | for the brake? You’ll eventually get use to "feeling" if the engine is about to stall.  The e-brake trick is a common one…not to worry.

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach?

Econobox.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – : I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to : drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to : get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on : the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. : : This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without : street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to : stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. : What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach? Probably some GM P.O.S. The same company that would mate a foot-operated emergency brake with a manual transmission (on the other hand, Ford this on one of my POS cars). It must be an "American thing".

Most manual trans Volvo 240 series came with no tach, not a big deal, you only need a tach if you are deaf, or unaware of what a car is supposed to sound/feel like. Bernard

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach?

My (now departed) 1973 Dodge panel van with a "3-on-a-tree".

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach?

Unfortunately, most of them. A tachometer is seen as an extra-cost doodad, and a manual transmission as for the pathetically poor. It seems that lots of cars with automatics come with a tach, though.  At one time, I wanted to order a manual Escort with a tach; I would have had to order tilt wheel and cruise to get it, as I recall. <snip — -Stephen H. Westin Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street.

What kind of car has a manual trans and no tach? So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

I doubt it.  You’re going so slow, it’s not heating up the brakes at all.

Response:

I wouldn’t say that it is bad for the brake unless this is happening alot, but the effect on the clutch might be a different matter.

I agree. The fact that you need to use the e-brake is indicitave of poor clutching.

Or indicative of early training in the use of the clutch. It is, admittedly, the easiest way to get going when you don’t have the various hand and foot coordination efforts down pat. Eventually, the OP will want to get to the point where he/she can sit on a hill, gradually release the clutch to the point that it is engaging and starting to slow down the engine a bit. Then, once ready to start out, release the brake pedal and gently apply throttle to help the slipping clutch keep the car from at least rolling back, and preferably moving forward. If the road you’re practicing on is too steep than try a lower grade until you feel more comfortable.

That’s how I taught my daughter, and am now teaching my son, to perform this admittedly tricky maneuver. Otherwise, as someone else mentioned, eventually you get used to it and will just be able to feel the engine.

Or know your vehicle well enough to not even feel or hear the engine. I can shift either of my vehicles without looking down at the tach (one doesn’t have one) even with the radio going and the A/C blowing full blast. Eventually, you just get a good feel for each vehicle and know about when to shift subconciously. Beware of anyone that attempts to get you to focus on shifting at a particular RPM or particular speed (if you don’t have a tach). I’ve watched more than one person spend more time concentrating on the instrument panel than the road in an attempt to not "burn out their engine" or, worse yet, to "save gas". Most modern engines have a cut-off to keep you from overrevving the engine. — Malcolm

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

I wouldn’t say that it is bad for the brake unless this is happening alot, but the effect on the clutch might be a different matter. The fact that you need to use the e-brake is indicitave of poor clutching. Taking too long to engage the clutch and start your forward movement could be causing excessive wear. You should shoot for one second max from beginning to engage to full engagement of the clutch even on a hill. This will prevent you from rolling back once you get the hang of it. It’s probably better to chirp your tires a little rather than burn the clutch. If the road you’re practicing on is too steep than try a lower grade until you feel more comfortable. Even after years of driving a stick, I still feel uneasy when I drive w/o a tach because I often tend to shift late and would suggest that you try to get one installed if you can. Otherwise, as someone else mentioned, eventually you get used to it and will just be able to feel the engine. After a while, it’s so natural that driving an automatic will be unnerving. Good luck

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

You don’t have to listen for it, you’ll feel it. Seriously if a car starts lugging there’s no doubt about what it’s doing. Experience is the best teacher in this case and he’s probably right on the 20 hour thing.

Response:

I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad for the brake?

Response:

|I recently bought a car with a stickshift and I’m learning how to | drive it. Someone told me it takes about 20 hours of city driving to | get used to the stickshift, and I’ve probably spent only 2 hours on | the street and 5 in an empty parking lot. | | This car has a VERY quiet engine and no tachometer, so even without | street noise, it’s very hard to tell when the engine is about to | stall. And it’s almost impossible on the street. | | So, when I have to start uphill, I completely release the handbrake | only when the car starts to inch forward. My question is: is this bad | for the brake? You’ll eventually get use to "feeling" if the engine is about to stall.  The e-brake trick is a common one…not to worry.

Response:

Help selecting tires?

Question:

I have the response here in the newsgroup!  Thanks very much; I’ll likely go for the HydroEdge in the stock 215/70-15 size, then.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :) Not too much.  All I really want is a quality tire that will handle well in rain & snow.  ie – good traction for _reasonable_ driving. crap.  I had posted a good response at work before going home… no sign of it.  Short answer – the HydroEdge are one step up according to Michelin, and tirerack.com is offering a $40 rebate if you buy 4, so the price ends up being $90 per instead of $84 per for a better tire.  I’d spring the extra $6 per tire.  (slightly better tire and 10k better treadlife. (90k vs 80k)) Ray

Response:

Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :) Not too much.  All I really want is a quality tire that will handle well in rain & snow.  ie – good traction for _reasonable_ driving.

crap.  I had posted a good response at work before going home… no sign of it.  Short answer – the HydroEdge are one step up according to Michelin, and tirerack.com is offering a $40 rebate if you buy 4, so the price ends up being $90 per instead of $84 per for a better tire.  I’d spring the extra $6 per tire.  (slightly better tire and 10k better treadlife. (90k vs 80k)) Ray

Response:

Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :)

Not too much.  All I really want is a quality tire that will handle well in rain & snow.  ie – good traction for _reasonable_ driving.

Response:

Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :) Not too much.  All I really want is a quality tire that will handle well in rain & snow.  ie – good traction for _reasonable_ driving.

 From Tirerack. 215/70-15’s Price: Harmony: $84 HydroEdge: $100 (so that’s $64 extra for 4 tires… + taxes) Wear: HydroEdge: 760 Harmony: 680 Honestly, it seems like a tossup.  I’d probably spring the extra few bucks for the HydroEdge – they’ll last a bit longer (10% in theory.) But the Harmonys get good reviews and are cheaper. fwiw, tirerack.com is offering $40 rebate if you buy 4 HydroEdge tires which makes them almost the same price.  According to Michelin’s website they are their "premium" all-season radial vs the Harmony. http://www.michelinman.com/catalog/index_4.html Ray

Response:

Hi, I posted a question last week about tire sizes, but didn’t get any response. I don’t think my title was appropriate. I have a 1995 Ford Windstar and I need new tires.  I’ve narrowed down my selection to the Michelin Harmony or HydroEdge.  The tire size for this van (according to the placard in the door) is 215/70-15. (1) Is the HydroEdge worth the extra money?  I will be driving in snow as well. (2) Should I go with a narrower tire?  205/75-15 or ???  I understand that a narrower tire gives better snow handling. Any other thoughts? Thanks.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I posted a question last week about tire sizes, but didn’t get any response. I don’t think my title was appropriate. I have a 1995 Ford Windstar and I need new tires.  I’ve narrowed down my selection to the Michelin Harmony or HydroEdge.  The tire size for this van (according to the placard in the door) is 215/70-15. (1) Is the HydroEdge worth the extra money?  I will be driving in snow as well. (2) Should I go with a narrower tire?  205/75-15 or ???  I understand that a narrower tire gives better snow handling. Any other thoughts? Thanks.

1) If you’re replacing all 4 tires changing tire sizes is fine – if you’re only doing two I’d keep the same size all the way around. 2) I don’t think I’d worry too much about deviating from stock size to increase handling or snow capability – one size up/down is only 10mm (less than a 1/2 inch) and I think to really notice any handling differences you’d need a bigger change than that.  Like from 205/75 to a 235/60 you’d notice some change – probably more based on the fact a 235/60 would be more of a performance tire…  my motto – regular car, regular tires, regular size.  Makes things simpler.  (Performance and race cars are a different story.) Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :) Ray

Response:

Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :) Not too much.  All I really want is a quality tire that will handle well in rain & snow.  ie – good traction for _reasonable_ driving.

 From Tirerack. 215/70-15’s Price: Harmony: $84 HydroEdge: $100 (so that’s $64 extra for 4 tires… + taxes) Wear: HydroEdge: 760 Harmony: 680 Honestly, it seems like a tossup.  I’d probably spring the extra few bucks for the HydroEdge – they’ll last a bit longer (10% in theory.) But the Harmonys get good reviews and are cheaper. fwiw, tirerack.com is offering $40 rebate if you buy 4 HydroEdge tires which makes them almost the same price.  According to Michelin’s website they are their "premium" all-season radial vs the Harmony. http://www.michelinman.com/catalog/index_4.html Ray

Response:

Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :) Not too much.  All I really want is a quality tire that will handle well in rain & snow.  ie – good traction for _reasonable_ driving.

crap.  I had posted a good response at work before going home… no sign of it.  Short answer – the HydroEdge are one step up according to Michelin, and tirerack.com is offering a $40 rebate if you buy 4, so the price ends up being $90 per instead of $84 per for a better tire.  I’d spring the extra $6 per tire.  (slightly better tire and 10k better treadlife. (90k vs 80k)) Ray

Response:

I have the response here in the newsgroup!  Thanks very much; I’ll likely go for the HydroEdge in the stock 215/70-15 size, then.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :) Not too much.  All I really want is a quality tire that will handle well in rain & snow.  ie – good traction for _reasonable_ driving. crap.  I had posted a good response at work before going home… no sign of it.  Short answer – the HydroEdge are one step up according to Michelin, and tirerack.com is offering a $40 rebate if you buy 4, so the price ends up being $90 per instead of $84 per for a better tire.  I’d spring the extra $6 per tire.  (slightly better tire and 10k better treadlife. (90k vs 80k)) Ray

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I posted a question last week about tire sizes, but didn’t get any response. I don’t think my title was appropriate. I have a 1995 Ford Windstar and I need new tires.  I’ve narrowed down my selection to the Michelin Harmony or HydroEdge.  The tire size for this van (according to the placard in the door) is 215/70-15. (1) Is the HydroEdge worth the extra money?  I will be driving in snow as well. (2) Should I go with a narrower tire?  205/75-15 or ???  I understand that a narrower tire gives better snow handling. Any other thoughts? Thanks.

1) If you’re replacing all 4 tires changing tire sizes is fine – if you’re only doing two I’d keep the same size all the way around. 2) I don’t think I’d worry too much about deviating from stock size to increase handling or snow capability – one size up/down is only 10mm (less than a 1/2 inch) and I think to really notice any handling differences you’d need a bigger change than that.  Like from 205/75 to a 235/60 you’d notice some change – probably more based on the fact a 235/60 would be more of a performance tire…  my motto – regular car, regular tires, regular size.  Makes things simpler.  (Performance and race cars are a different story.) Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :) Ray

Response:

Lastly, you have a _minivan_ – how often are you cornering at .5G anyway? :)

Not too much.  All I really want is a quality tire that will handle well in rain & snow.  ie – good traction for _reasonable_ driving.

Response:

Hi, I posted a question last week about tire sizes, but didn’t get any response. I don’t think my title was appropriate. I have a 1995 Ford Windstar and I need new tires.  I’ve narrowed down my selection to the Michelin Harmony or HydroEdge.  The tire size for this van (according to the placard in the door) is 215/70-15. (1) Is the HydroEdge worth the extra money?  I will be driving in snow as well. (2) Should I go with a narrower tire?  205/75-15 or ???  I understand that a narrower tire gives better snow handling. Any other thoughts? Thanks.

Response:

Seeing more of California

Question:

We took the 101 route back which is very nice, although it took about 8-9 hours, compared to Mapquests recommendation on route 5 which would be 5 hours.

It’s worth it to take the longer route. I-5 is the most boring drive you could ever do. You quite possibly saved yourself from driving off the road to kill yourself over the agony. LCing since 12/01/03- Me- 5′7" 265/181/140 & hubby- 6′ 310/198/180 http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/lcer09/my_photos

Response:

LOL, ain’t it the truth. :-) — Cheri Type 2, no meds for now. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – It’s worth it to take the longer route. I-5 is the most boring drive you could ever do. You quite possibly saved yourself from driving off the road to kill yourself over the agony. LCing since 12/01/03- Me- 5′7" 265/181/140 & hubby- 6′ 310/198/180 http://f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/lcer09/my_photos

Response:

It’s worth it to take the longer route. I-5 is the most boring drive you could ever do. You quite possibly saved yourself from driving off the road to kill yourself over the agony.

He, well, I went on 5 / 99 from sac to sequoia nat’l park and again from tehre to L.A. and I was entertained by those near accidents with the obstacles on the road :)

Response:

Hi, I haven’t been able to bless this NG with ruthless perfectionism (haha) because my brother was visiting and we toured around the state. He doesn’t have a driver’s licence, so I got to drive all the time. A fact which was most annoying when we went to Napa Valley for wine tastings and tours. It is rather painful to spit out $50-$100 wines As he is a sucker for rollercoasters, we also got season passes for Six Flags Marine World (allowing free access to all the other parks as well). We went there for the 4th of July with my roommate and it was fun: http://www.cvmt.dk/~mnielsen/sixflags/surf.jpg Of course, my brother had done his research and Magic Mnt. is considered   #1 in the world, and this one was the best ride we got: http://www.cvmt.dk/~mnielsen/sixflags/X.jpg He got a little worried that the trip would be ruined before we went, though. We went to the Sequoia National park a couple of days and he was afraid that sitting in the passenger seat in the mountains would make all the roller coasters feel bland in comparison Of course we also saw the Jelly Bellies factory and the most popular attraction in Sacramento: Fry’s Electronics the Waterworld there was ok, but nothing spectacular. In a water park in Denmark there’s wild rivers for the tubes instead of just a slow family river. Maybe they are afraid of getting sued here, becuase it is easy to sprain an ankle in the wild rivers. Lots of action on the freeway, though. We saw lots of cops giving tickets, a car right next to me going the same speed as me got pulled over, phheew. A truck (one of those with an open bed, like a Ford 150) dropped his load in front of me, and another time a big truck tried to avoid a wooden log on the road, but he hit it sending it flying in front of me. I managed to decrease the speed just enough to match the collision as the log was hitting the ground again, instead of my windshield or headlight as it would have if I hadn’t noticed anything. We took the 101 route back which is very nice, although it took about 8-9 hours, compared to Mapquests recommendation on route 5 which would be 5 hours. Before he left we went to San Francisco, where the one way streets/no turning signs still annoy me. And the bloody map shows that a road leads somewhere it doesn’t. the hills are fun though, and the crooked Lombardo street, even though it is annoying that there’s always otehr cars trying it, so it’s impossible to go fast on it. My brother said the people who decided to make a city there was crazy. And I was crazy for keeping going back up to go down Lombardo street I find it amusing that most of the step hills does not warn about that it is a hill, but a few places there’s a sign, and those hills are just   crazy. It feels like driving out into the free air, because the entire hill is hidden under the car as you go forward. I don’t have my pictures from the Sequoia park and Crystal Cave with me now.

Response:

2001 GT Spark Plugs

Question:

Looking to change the spark plugs in my 01 GT.  The Haynes manual just states the plugs are ‘on top of the engine’ and would love to make sure I’m poking at the right spot before it’s too late. Would someone please take a look here to see if I’m right in the location of the spark plugs: http://204.101.251.227/LinuxUser/engine.jpg I’ve changed spark plugs in my beater (93 Asuna Sunfire) before but it’s nothing like this. I figured this would be relatively easy to find on the web or in forums but no such luck; only "nightmare stories" about changing them. TIA Jeff 01 GT FIPK

Response:

Close but no cigar.  Your picture is of the fule rail.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Looking to change the spark plugs in my 01 GT.  The Haynes manual just states the plugs are ‘on top of the engine’ and would love to make sure I’m poking at the right spot before it’s too late. Would someone please take a look here to see if I’m right in the location of the spark plugs: http://204.101.251.227/LinuxUser/engine.jpg I’ve changed spark plugs in my beater (93 Asuna Sunfire) before but it’s nothing like this. I figured this would be relatively easy to find on the web or in forums but no such luck; only "nightmare stories" about changing them. TIA Jeff 01 GT FIPK

Response:

Yep… the li’l round doofers with the green tops are the Coil On Plug units. A 7mm socket will undo the capscrews holding the COP units to the head….. undo the primary (little wires), twist the assembly back and forth a bit to break the boot loose from the head and it should wigle out with little fuss. Some like to loosen the fuel rail and lift it up but I haven’t found it necessary plus we leave the chance for either a fuel or vacuum leaks once we’re done. Clean the area around the COPs before removing them… if you have compressed air, blow the plug wells out before removing the plugs (if not, take a good look to be sure there are no little "surprises" in there). NO antisieze on the threads and torque the plugs to 14 ft/lbs….. the plug inserts in the head have been known to be trouble so strict adherence is important. You’re much better off to perform this minor surgery on a cold motor. HTH

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Looking to change the spark plugs in my 01 GT.  The Haynes manual just states the plugs are ‘on top of the engine’ and would love to make sure I’m poking at the right spot before it’s too late. Would someone please take a look here to see if I’m right in the location of the spark plugs: http://204.101.251.227/LinuxUser/engine.jpg I’ve changed spark plugs in my beater (93 Asuna Sunfire) before but it’s nothing like this. I figured this would be relatively easy to find on the web or in forums but no such luck; only "nightmare stories" about changing them. TIA Jeff 01 GT FIPK

Response:

<<…NO antisieze on the threads and torque the plugs to 14 ft/lbs… the plug inserts in the head have been known to be trouble so strict adherence is important… Just curious, why no antiseize?  Will yield incorrect torque value?  Or may allow plug to loosen over time at given torque?  Also, you say the plug inserts have been known to be trouble… what type of trouble?  Do they come loose, or strip, or?   Again, just curious.  Thanks.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Yep… the li’l round doofers with the green tops are the Coil On Plug units. A 7mm socket will undo the capscrews holding the COP units to the head….. undo the primary (little wires), twist the assembly back and forth a bit to break the boot loose from the head and it should wigle out with little fuss. Some like to loosen the fuel rail and lift it up but I haven’t found it necessary plus we leave the chance for either a fuel or vacuum leaks once we’re done. Clean the area around the COPs before removing them… if you have compressed air, blow the plug wells out before removing the plugs (if not, take a good look to be sure there are no little "surprises" in there). NO antisieze on the threads and torque the plugs to 14 ft/lbs….. the plug inserts in the head have been known to be trouble so strict adherence is important. You’re much better off to perform this minor surgery on a cold motor. HTH

Thanks for the info Jim.  Why no anti-sieze?  The book says to apply it but I know books and reality can be 2 different things. Jeff

Response:

Jeff and Fred…. The factory service manual does not say to use antisieze – ergo, we don’t use antisieze. It doesn’t say not to but you can rest assured that if Ford had intended antisieze to be there, it would be evident in the plugs that are being removed and it would be stated in the service manual. Yes, it can change the way that 11 ft/lbs (sorry for the misinformation – pick-ups are 14 but the Mustang shop manual I have in front of me – 2004 – quotes 11) presents itself to the insert. We have seen many of these inserts pulled out of the head and/or stripped. It usually takes a while for it to manifest itself but we have had no failures on plugs we do correctly in our shop. Additionally, the antisieze compound can change the way that heat transfers from the plug into the cylinder head….. this would have the same affect as installing hotter plugs and could lead to engine ping and eventual engine damage. HTH. Taking extra care at plug change time can keep nasty stuff from invading our wallets.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – <<…NO antisieze on the threads and torque the plugs to 14 ft/lbs… the plug inserts in the head have been known to be trouble so strict adherence is important… Just curious, why no antiseize?  Will yield incorrect torque value?  Or may allow plug to loosen over time at given torque?  Also, you say the plug inserts have been known to be trouble… what type of trouble?  Do they come loose, or strip, or?   Again, just curious.  Thanks.

Response:

Yep… the li’l round doofers

That’s a technical term that some people who are not professional mechanics may not understand…  :-D —

Response:

<<…Additionally, the antisieze compound can change the way that heat transfers from the plug into the cylinder head…this would have the same affect as installing hotter plugs and could lead to engine ping and eventual engine damage… Thanks for the good info.  I have always used a small bit of antiseize when changing plugs in my vehicles.  Never had a problem.  But the heat transfer issue that you pointed out is indeed something to consider.  I applaud your reasoning: if the manufacturer did not use it, then do not use it. Having said that, my guess is that Ford does not use antiseize on the plugs mainly because that would simply cost more.  They are not worried about getting the plugs out later on… that’s the owner’s responsibility, so I could understand an owner wanting to use antiseize in order to make future removal "easier". Any given manual may or may not recommend using antiseize… I’ve seen some of the "aftermarket" type manuals recommend antiseize on everything, must have just been the editor’s personal preference or something.  I guess with older cars, cast iron stuff, you can’t really go wrong using antiseize.  But with newer cars, aluminum stuff, where temperature and fastener torque is more critical, I would totally agree to simply follow the manufacturer’s word to the tee.

Response:

TransAm Club

Question:

Trans Ams look soo sexy, IMO. I still think Ford dominates in the sound area, but wow Trans Ams are so f*cking nice. Don’t get me wrong.. I love Elizabeth (my GT’s name), but still… can’t deny that Cambirds are awesome. -Mike

   Okay, don’t EVER say that again. If you insist on using the word "sexy" to describe a car, please get your girlfriend to do it! Otherwise change that to "cool", "awesome" "wicked" or "bad-ass"… —

Response:

Trans Ams look soo sexy, IMO. I still think Ford dominates in the sound area, but wow Trans Ams are so f*cking nice. Don’t get me wrong.. I love Elizabeth (my GT’s name), but still… can’t deny that Cambirds are awesome.

   Sure, they’re bitchin’ if you don’t mind sneaking up on them with a can of Raid and a rubber mallet just to get inside. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – -Mike I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool — 95 Mustang GT 5.0 Convertible 5 Speed

– CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

Trans Ams look soo sexy, IMO. I still think Ford dominates in the sound area, but wow Trans Ams are so f*cking nice. Don’t get me wrong.. I love Elizabeth (my GT’s name), but still… can’t deny that Cambirds are awesome.

Right up until 1999, I agree. Then they made them look comical to me: half a dozen nostrils and fenders that look like they could hide a family of four…each. Kind of like a caricature of a body builder in automotive form. The ‘69.5 will always be the only T/A for me. Followed by the ‘70-’72, especially the Formula’s. — Dan 2003 Cobra convertible With some stuff and things

Response:

phh. My 4.6 sounds better than any Chevy and just as good as any BB Ford…mostly :) . I’ll buy sounding better than a Chevy , but not a Big Block no way no how! :)  Yes, way. The problem is that there’s a displacement beyond which even the Ford engineers can’t prevent ugliness. Again, the BB’s are nice at idle, but most start to slip away from ideal as they ramp up. Especially when the heads get hogged out or a real open exhaust is put on.

   You need watch some SE or SS cars for a bit. Don’t get me wrong, you can make any motor sound crappy. It’s a shame Magnablows are so cheap ’cause there’s a sure way to ruin the sound out of a nicely setup motor: loudness. Unless you are staging at a tree or warming up the tires on a grid, loudness is a waste. It’s just that it ruins GMs instantly and BB’s faster :) .

– CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

How you figure? LS1’s are 346 or 347 CI.    Why woudn’t you want to out-cube them?    Because it’s completely unnecessary, unless you WANT to rebuild your engine for no real reason.

   That’s right. Cubes are unnecessary. Smaller the better.    I think you and Dan are posting from the same opium den today. — CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

SEXAAAAHHHHHHHH -Mike

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Trans Ams look soo sexy, IMO. I still think Ford dominates in the sound area, but wow Trans Ams are so f*cking nice. Don’t get me wrong.. I love Elizabeth (my GT’s name), but still… can’t deny that Cambirds are awesome. -Mike    Okay, don’t EVER say that again. If you insist on using the word "sexy" to describe a car, please get your girlfriend to do it! Otherwise change that to "cool", "awesome" "wicked" or "bad-ass"… —

Response:

lmao

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Trans Ams look soo sexy, IMO. I still think Ford dominates in the sound area, but wow Trans Ams are so f*cking nice. Don’t get me wrong.. I love Elizabeth (my GT’s name), but still… can’t deny that Cambirds are awesome.    Sure, they’re bitchin’ if you don’t mind sneaking up on them with a can of Raid and a rubber mallet just to get inside. -Mike I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool — 95 Mustang GT 5.0 Convertible 5 Speed — CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

Personaly I don’t like the sound of the cambirds and their fake duals. As Cobra Jet pointed out put a 351w based engine in and the extra cubes will make your car sound really good. MadDAWG

Response:

I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ?

Dunno. The GM’s don’t sound all that good to me. They are OK at idle but with any kind of exhaust they just get loud and character-less. To me, Ford has always dominated in getting a motor to perform *and* sound nice. — Dan 2003 Cobra convertible With some stuff and things

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool    Cubic inches. Start saving up for a 408.

phh. My 4.6 sounds better than any Chevy and just as good as any BB Ford…mostly :) . — Dan 2003 Cobra convertible With some stuff and things

Response:

phh. My 4.6 sounds better than any Chevy and just as good as any BB Ford…mostly :) .

I’ll buy sounding better than a Chevy , but not a Big Block no way no how! :) MadDAWG

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? Dunno. The GM’s don’t sound all that good to me. They are OK at idle but with any kind of exhaust they just get loud and character-less. To me, Ford has always dominated in getting a motor to perform *and* sound nice.

   Chevys always sounded to me like those boats they had on the river rides at Disneyland. — Dan 2003 Cobra convertible With some stuff and things

– CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool    Cubic inches. Start saving up for a 408. phh. My 4.6 sounds better than any Chevy and just as good as any BB Ford…mostly :) .

   You’re supposed to be smoking tires, not that funny green stuff. — CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool    Cubic inches. Start saving up for a 408.

How you figure? LS1’s are 346 or 347 CI. —

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? Dunno. The GM’s don’t sound all that good to me. They are OK at idle but with any kind of exhaust they just get loud and character-less. To me, Ford has always dominated in getting a motor to perform *and* sound nice.    Chevys always sounded to me like those boats they had on the river rides at Disneyland.

You’re not supposed to be that far behind them. :) Al     On with the flame deflector and rusty camshaft shield.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool    Cubic inches. Start saving up for a 408. How you figure? LS1’s are 346 or 347 CI.

   Why woudn’t you want to out-cube them? — CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? Dunno. The GM’s don’t sound all that good to me. They are OK at idle but with any kind of exhaust they just get loud and character-less. To me, Ford has always dominated in getting a motor to perform *and* sound nice.    Chevys always sounded to me like those boats they had on the river rides at Disneyland. You’re not supposed to be that far behind them. :) Al     On with the flame deflector and rusty camshaft shield.

   Ooh, big talk from a Beretta-owning spaghetti-slurper.    CobraJet — CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

Trans Ams look soo sexy, IMO. I still think Ford dominates in the sound area, but wow Trans Ams are so f*cking nice. Don’t get me wrong.. I love Elizabeth (my GT’s name), but still… can’t deny that Cambirds are awesome. -Mike

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool — 95 Mustang GT 5.0 Convertible 5 Speed

Response:

How you figure? LS1’s are 346 or 347 CI.    Why woudn’t you want to out-cube them?

   Because it’s completely unnecessary, unless you WANT to rebuild your engine for no real reason. —

Response:

phh. My 4.6 sounds better than any Chevy and just as good as any BB Ford…mostly :) . I’ll buy sounding better than a Chevy , but not a Big Block no way no how! :)

 Yes, way. The problem is that there’s a displacement beyond which even the Ford engineers can’t prevent ugliness. Again, the BB’s are nice at idle, but most start to slip away from ideal as they ramp up. Especially when the heads get hogged out or a real open exhaust is put on. Don’t get me wrong, you can make any motor sound crappy. It’s a shame Magnablows are so cheap ’cause there’s a sure way to ruin the sound out of a nicely setup motor: loudness. Unless you are staging at a tree or warming up the tires on a grid, loudness is a waste. It’s just that it ruins GMs instantly and BB’s faster :) . — Dan 2003 Cobra convertible With some stuff and things

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool    Cubic inches. Start saving up for a 408. phh. My 4.6 sounds better than any Chevy and just as good as any BB Ford…mostly :) .    You’re supposed to be smoking tires, not that funny green stuff.

My beautiful sounding tiny motor does the first at will. Never done the second. Got high off of unburnt fuel additives leaving an exhaust manifold once or twice, but never in an unnatural way ;) . — Dan 2003 Cobra convertible With some stuff and things

Response:

I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool — 95 Mustang GT 5.0 Convertible 5 Speed

Response:

What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ?

Holes drilled in the muffler’s to make the V6’s sound like V8’s. Holes drilled in the muffler’s of the V8’s to make’m sound like loud POS’s ;) — Scott W. ‘66 Mustang HCS 289 ‘68 Ranchero 500 302 ‘69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W ‘97 Cougar 30th Anniv SE 4.6L ThunderSnake #57

Response:

I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month now -Exton, PA. All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very high speeds. Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? – Shardool

   Cubic inches. Start saving up for a 408. — CobraJet Thunder Snake #1

Response:

There is SOMETHING about a Chebby engine that sounds like no other. It stills my heart and makes me flutter. I cannot explain other than when I was growing up my big brother ran stock cars and all of my first hot rods were Chevys… *sigh* a cam, some pipes, intake a carb and ohhh jeeze.. I gotta go take a shower. Kate

| I was cruising last Sunday in this new town I have been in for about a month | now -Exton, PA. | All of a sudden I saw about 15 TransAms/Firebirds race down the road at very | high speeds. | Since my top was down it almost deafened me for a minute at the same time I | was amazed by the kind of sound those cars made. | What is so different about a TransAm that makes it sound so good ? | | – Shardool | — | 95 Mustang GT 5.0 Convertible 5 Speed | |

Response:

tranny fluid question: tremec tranny (mach 1) and others

Question:

Charlene gets her transmission fluid changed every 20,000 miles, and she gets Mobil One Mercon V Synthetic.  It’s probably overkill.  I’ve heard some tranny mechanics insist that it should be changed every 10,000.  The owner’s manual is fuzzy on this point altogether. My recommendation: 20,000 mile/3 year intervals. Also, since the car is new, you *may* wish to change over to synthetic fluid now.  Charlene got hers at 800 miles, and she still shifts like brand-new. Very nice stuff. -JD |                                                        | | 1998 Laser Red GT     RAMFM Member Since 1997          | | M-5400-A Suspension   http:/207.13.104.8/users/jdadams | | Subframe Connectors & Seat Bracing, Strut Tower Brace  | | 4-point K-frame Brace, Tremec T-45 & OEM 3.27:1 Gears  |

Response:

np. It really is easy to change the transmission fluid. Is easier if you have ramps. Be sure the car is as level as can be though. -Mike

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – |  I’m not aware of any transmission break-in period. I’d check the owners |  manual & see. As for a repair manual… get a Helms manual for your car. |  It’s in the neighborhood of $100~$130. And yes, I’m sure you can change your |  own tranny fluid. I just did it recently. How many miles are on the car |  right now? Before you change your transmission fluid, be sure you have some right now there are only 800 miles. i just figure i want to get a handle pretty early on of what i should be doing. thanks for tip on the hand pump. — ‘04 Mach 1, Torch Red (pix soon) Steeda Tri-Ax (1quick6 shifter gasket set)

Response:

I’m not aware of any transmission break-in period. I’d check the owners manual & see. As for a repair manual… get a Helms manual for your car. It’s in the neighborhood of $100~$130. And yes, I’m sure you can change your own tranny fluid. I just did it recently. How many miles are on the car right now? Before you change your transmission fluid, be sure you have some sort of hand pump so you can pump the fluid into the tranny. And yes.. switch to a synthetic… synthetic is always better, IMO. -Mike

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – when should i first change my transmission fluid (‘04 mach 1)? is there a break-in period as there is for engine oil? i hold the theory that in terms of vehicle maintenance, i’d rather err on the side of caution and assume heavy duty cycles/high performance usage for maintenace items, if that makes any sense. so if i assume that drag racers probably change their trans fluid after every race, and that people who don’t care about their cars probably _never_ change it… where should i fall in my regular change intervals? assume that this is a weekend driver only — no daily driving of this for me. i’ll probably go to the drag strip a few times a year to (a) get to know my car a bit better under controlled conditions. (b) better understand what my mods do for performance. (c) have fun with a few other mustang (and one other camaro ss) owners and have fun. when i drive on the weekends, i’m not the kind of guy to burn out and shit like that. but i’ll step into her quite a bit from time to time! any thoughts appreciated. also… i’ve read on some of these web forums where people have trouble going from first to second with this tranny. and in at least one forum, i think tremec’s official position was to reduce the amount of trans fluid (i forget from and to how much), and to switch to a synthetic (i think — can’t find the reference currently). should i do this if i don’t have 1st — 2nd problems? is it likely i can change my own trans fluid? i have jackstands, and change my own oil, and am slightly beyond the rookie stage of being a shade tree mechanic, i would estimate. also, conventional wisdom among the `enlightened’ seems to be skip Chilton’s and Haynes and go for the official factory repair manual — is that the offical name for what i want? is my local Ford dealer likely to give me dumb looks if i ask them to order one for me? i would guess that these puppies sell for well over $100. if i budget ~$150, is it likely i could get one? thanks, all (can finally have a new .sig!) –john — ‘04 Mach 1, Torch Red (pix soon) Steeda Tri-Ax (1quick6 shifter gasket set)

Response:

when should i first change my transmission fluid (‘04 mach 1)? is there a break-in period as there is for engine oil? i hold the theory that in terms of vehicle maintenance, i’d rather err on the side of caution and assume heavy duty cycles/high performance usage for maintenace items, if that makes any sense. so if i assume that drag racers probably change their trans fluid after every race, and that people who don’t care about their cars probably _never_ change it… where should i fall in my regular change intervals? assume that this is a weekend driver only — no daily driving of this for me. i’ll probably go to the drag strip a few times a year to (a) get to know my car a bit better under controlled conditions. (b) better understand what my mods do for performance. (c) have fun with a few other mustang (and one other camaro ss) owners and have fun. when i drive on the weekends, i’m not the kind of guy to burn out and shit like that. but i’ll step into her quite a bit from time to time! any thoughts appreciated. also… i’ve read on some of these web forums where people have trouble going from first to second with this tranny. and in at least one forum, i think tremec’s official position was to reduce the amount of trans fluid (i forget from and to how much), and to switch to a synthetic (i think — can’t find the reference currently). should i do this if i don’t have 1st — 2nd problems? is it likely i can change my own trans fluid? i have jackstands, and change my own oil, and am slightly beyond the rookie stage of being a shade tree mechanic, i would estimate. also, conventional wisdom among the `enlightened’ seems to be skip Chilton’s and Haynes and go for the official factory repair manual — is that the offical name for what i want? is my local Ford dealer likely to give me dumb looks if i ask them to order one for me? i would guess that these puppies sell for well over $100. if i budget ~$150, is it likely i could get one? thanks, all (can finally have a new .sig!) –john — ‘04 Mach 1, Torch Red (pix soon) Steeda Tri-Ax (1quick6 shifter gasket set)

Response: